【真正的「懂」是在行動作為中】
當你真正「懂」這段三分鐘影片裡所講的道理時，
你已開始對一種 「遠比信念強大的力量」覺醒。
它會帶給我們一種對「自己與萬物存在的力量更相互結合、
與宇宙之流更為和諧一致」的自然覺知。
如果你還沒完全懂它，不妨再看一遍，
並反芻和牢記裡面「和你內心共鳴」的那句話或那個觀念
——那是來自你的較高心智(higher mind)在告訴你的聲音。
巴夏精選短片(3分12秒)：【真正的「懂」是在行動作為中】Bashar061
影片摘自：Bashar Session 2013-The Year of Reinvention
完整影片購買網址：http://www.basharstore.com/year-of-reinvention/
字幕翻譯：Jimmy
觀看/下載此影片簡體中文版：https://goo.gl/SdKxBQ
【真正的「懂」是在行動作為中】
True Knowing is in Actions.
切記，請大家切記：「真正懂」和「行動作為」是同義詞。
理解嗎？
Remember, please all of you remember, knowing and behavior are synonymous.
嗯。
Yes?
你理解這點嗎？
Do you understand this?
嗯。
Uh-huh.
你確定嗎？
是的，我明白這點。
Are you sure?
Yes, I understand that.
好的。那些你真正懂(知道)的事情，是你能夠去做而你只是直接去做，你不會去思考或是懷疑自己能不能做到的事情。
Alright. The things you know that you can do, you just do, you don’t think about them, you don’t wonder if you believe them.
如果我說：「請你從房間的左邊走到右邊。」會站起來說：「嗯，我…我…我想我可以。我…我…我相信我可以從房間的左邊走到右邊，但我不太確定」嗎？
If I say: “Would you please walk across the room?” Do you stand and go like: “Well, I…I… I think I can. I…I believe that it’s possible for me to walk across the room, I’m not really sure.”
不，你只是直接從左邊走到右邊，因為你知道你可以。
No, you just walk across the room, because you know you can.
真正的「懂」和「行為」及「行動」是同義詞。所以當你知道一些事情是真實的，你不會質疑，你只是直接表現在你的行為上。而這一點正是你們一直在生活中苦苦尋找的解惑關鍵。
Knowing and behavior and action are synonymous. So when you know something to be true, you don’t question it, you just do it.
And that’s the fusion you’re looking for in your lives.
你明白嗎？
嗯。
Do you understand?
Uh-huh.
這(Knowing)實際上已跨越和超出「相信、信念」的領域。｛即：Knowing(懂/知曉/內心清楚明白)是跨越和超出Belief(相信/信念/信仰)的領域。｝
「懂」是一種對某事的內在知曉，你真的知道(對那事情)你是清楚明白的。
It’s even beyond and above belief.
Knowing is inherent in who it is, you truly know you are.
你聽懂嗎？
我懂。
Yes?
Yes.
所以…接下來呢？
And? So?
什麼是代表你「懂」你所喜好想要了解而現在會去做的事情，取代了你之前在做的事情。現在你會如何在你的生活中表現出那樣的自由呢？
What will you now do that is representative of knowing what you prefer to know, instead of what you have been doing. How will you express that in your life now, in a way that is representative of that kind of freedom?
我覺得我必須開始假裝…
假裝什麼？
假裝我懂。
I feel like I have to start out pretending…
Pretending what?
That I know.
假裝你懂？
好的，你的意思是說弄假直到成真嗎？
是的。
Pretending that you know?
Alright, are you saying fake it till you make it, is that what you’re saying?
Yes.
但如果你知道你是在假裝，你又如何使之成真？
But if you know you’re faking it, how will you make it?
你的意思是說，如果你真的一直假裝，那麼最後你所假裝的多少會滲透進你而成為真的懂嗎？如果你相信那樣的話，它會有效用。但如果你不相信，它就不會有效用。
Are you saying you believe that if you do fake it enough, if you do pretend enough, that ultimately the pretending will somehow sink into you and will become real knowing? If you believe that, it will work. But if you don’t, it won’t.
其實這方式對我一直都沒有效用。
那就對了。
Actually, it’s never work for me.
Well, there you go.
所以意思是，實際地了解這運作結構，並「懂」這結構機制的運作是可行有效的，會是一種對你更有助益的東西。
So in that sense, it would be something that would work better for you to actually understand the mechanism and know the mechanism works.
去了解「萬物存在的本質和結構」以及「實相是如何運作」的。然後，你就會有一個「你可以運用這些知識」的工具，而不只是在猜測它們。
To understand the nature and structure of existence and how reality works. And then you have a tool that you can use with knowledge, and not just guessing at it.
對吧？
嗯。
Yes.
Uh-huh.
所以這就是為什麼我在這傳訊開始時說：真正去了解許多我們(巴夏那端的高度演化生命們)已經分享給你們的工具，或者你從其他來源吸引到你身邊的那些「真正在說明萬物存在的真實本質、萬物存在之結構」的工具，是件非常關鍵重要的事。
So this is why we said in the beginning of the transmission, that it can be critical for you to really understand a lot of the tools that were sharing with you, or the tools that you attract yourself from other sources, that are truly descriptive of the actual nature of existence, the structure of existence.
因為當你了解這結構之後，在這結構支撐下的任何其他東西，你將會看到哪些部分是與這個結構相稱以及哪些部分不相稱。而那些不相稱的，你可以放開讓它們離去。
For when you understand the structure, then anything else, when held up to that structure, you will see what parts of it fit the structure and what parts don’t. And the parts that don’t, you can let fall away.
這樣的話，你將有一條乾淨的路徑，一條明確的路徑，作為一個精確的工具，作為一種運作機制。而你不必去擔心或關注於其餘的部分，因為其餘的部分與此結構的工具無關，它只與「你所依附的信念系統」有關，它與其他的依附信念無關。
And then you’ll have a clean path, a clear path of exactly what will work as a tool, as a mechanism. And you won’t have to be concerned or focused with the rest of it, because the rest of it has nothing to do with the tool of the structure, it only has to do with belief systems you’ve attached to it, that have no business being attached to it.
