【 在你實相中你已創造的「你的版本的別人」】
巴夏精選短片(3分03秒)：【 在你實相中你已創造的「你的版本的別人」】Bashar244
影片摘自：2010 Bashar Session- Simultaneity of Existence
購買網址：http://www.basharstore.com/simultaneity-connecting/
中文翻譯：Jimmy
【 在你實相中你已創造的「你的版本的別人」】
You have created “your version of others” in your reality.
Q: Well, my question is, we’re creating our own reality, and…
Q: 好的，我的問題是，我們在創造我們自己的實相，並且…
Yes.
沒錯。
Q: So, in our reality, there is really just ourselves and other people that…
Q:所以說，在我們的實相裡，確實只有我們自己和其他人…
There exists yourself in your reality, and “Your version of other people” you have created in your reality to interact with.
存在於你的實相中有你自己，以及你已在你實相中創造要與你互動的「你的版本的其他人」。
Q: That’s it?
Q: 就這樣嗎？
That’s it.
就這麼簡單。
Q: So, are they at…
Q: 所以，他們是在…
But you are all doing the same thing.
但你們全都是那樣運作的(都是在自己的實相裡創造「自己版本的他人」)。
Q: So, everyone in my reality is just an aspect of me?
但你們全都是那樣運作的(某一面向的我的反映)嗎？
Everyone exists. But everyone you experience in your reality was created by you to interact with as a reflection of you.
每一個人都是確實存在的。但是，每一位你在「你的實相」中經驗到的人，都是以一種「你的某一面向的反映」被你創造出來與你互動的。
So, they exist in their own, right, but the only ones you actually interact with in physical reality, are the reflections you’ve created to experience in your reality.
所以，他們是存在於他們自己的實相，沒錯。但是，你在物質實相中實際與之互動的人，都僅是「你已在你的實相中以(你之前的)經驗創造出」的反映。
That’s why when you change your reality, and you change your frequency, sometimes you may find that you no longer interact with certain people. There’s simply no longer in that reality.
這就是為什麼，每當你改變你的實相和改變你的振頻時，有時候你會發現，你就不再與某些人們互動了。因為他們已經不在你的實相中了。
Q: Okay. What about people that you don’t really directly interact with? They just like, strangers passing that…
Q:好的。那麼，那些你並沒有真正與他們直接互動的人呢？他們就只是像擦身而過的陌生人…
It’s all an orchestration as you said, there are no accident.
整個所有人們之間的互動，就像你們說的「精心編排的管弦樂曲」一樣，(在那裡面)並沒有偶然或意外。
Q: Are they real? Or are they just like robots, or…?
Q:那些擦身而過的陌生人是真實存在的嗎？或者他們只是像機器人般，或者…？
Alright.
好的。
Let’s explain this again.
讓我再次說明這點。
Q: Okay.
好。
It is all real, and it is all an illusion, it is not this or that, it is this and that.
它全都是真實的，它全都是個幻覺，它並非「這樣」或是「那樣」，而是「既是這樣、也是那樣」。
The idea is that you have created them by agreement in the consensus reality, to have an orchestration that maybe serving them, maybe more than you understand how it needs to serve you.
這概念是：你已經在「你們集體共識的實相(consensus reality)中」創造了他們，以共同演出你們「精心篇排的管弦樂」，那可能對他們有助益，可能對你比你所了解的還更加有助益。
But nevertheless, you’re still serving some purpose with everyone that you interact with.
但是儘管如此，你仍是「效力於某目的」地與每一個人互動。
But the way you interact with people is by creating your version of them in your reality, so that you can see them.
但是，你與人們互動的方式是藉由「在你的實相中創造出你的版本的他們」，所以你能看見他們(你才有可能看見他們帶給你「你某一面向的反映」)。
Otherwise, you wouldn’t be seeing them, they be invisible to you.
否則(若是沒有這樣的「關連性(relevance)」)，你是不會看見他們的，他們對你來說會是不顯眼、覺察不出的。
They are interacting with you. You are interacting with them, but you’re interacting with them through a simulation that you’ve created in your reality.
他們在與你互動，而你也在與他們互動。但你是透過「你已在自己的實相中創造出一個模擬版的對方」的方式，在與他們互動。
Does that make sense?
你聽懂這運作的道理嗎？
Q: I think so. And, so, when I’m having a direct interaction with someone, is that both of us agreed to like, co-create?
Q:我想我懂。所以，當我與他人有著直接的互動時，那表示我們雙方已同意「共同創造」之類的約定嗎？
You cannot have an interaction without an agreement.
你無法在未取得對方同意下與他人有互動。
Q: Okay.
Q:好。
Now, again, there may be differences in what each is getting out of it. There maybe different purposes to it, different degrees of what you need from it, different kinds of reflections, but it cannot happen without an actual co-creation.
現在，再次重申，每個人從中獲得的東西或許有所不同。可能有不同的目的，不同程度的需求，不同種類的反映，但是在沒有共同創造的狀態下，互動是無法發生的。
Q: Okay.
Q:好的。
Make sense?
這麼說你理解嗎？
Q: Yes.
Q:理解。
Because you have to agree to create “Your version of them” in order to experience them in your reality at all.
因為你必須同意(在自己的實相中)創造出「你實相版本中的他們」，才能夠在你的實相中經驗到他們。
And they have to do the same to experience you to any degree at all.
而他們也必須做相同的事(在自己的實相中造出「他們實相版本中的你」)，才能夠在任何程度上經驗到與你的互動。
That’s why people on your planet that you often called, insane or crazy, are not having any less, real of interaction. They’re just having an interaction with something that the consensus reality doesn’t agree is part of their reality.
這就是為什麼地球上的人們經常稱「沒有任何一點或較少有真正互動」的行為為「精神錯亂」或「瘋狂古怪」的行為。其實他們只是在做一種「與(社會)集體共識的實相(consensus reality)不一致」的互動，而那是他們實相的一部分。
You understand?
你明白嗎？
Q: Yes.
Q:是的。
